論控審分離原則

摘   要

控審分離原則是現(xiàn)代刑事訴訟活動(dòng)中的1項(xiàng)重要原則。我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的刑事訴訟法已經(jīng)體現(xiàn)了控審分離原則的精神,但對(duì)于這1原則貫徹還不夠徹底。在偵查、審查起訴和審判程序中還存在許多與該原則精神相背離的地方。界定控審分離原則的基本內(nèi)涵，闡述其理論基礎(chǔ)和意義，分析控審分離原則在我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中的現(xiàn)狀，指出控審不分對(duì)我國(guó)法治的危害，并借鑒外國(guó)立法提出完善立法和司法的建議，無(wú)疑有利于我國(guó)刑事訴訟法制的現(xiàn)代化。

關(guān)鍵詞：刑事訴訟基本原則；控審分離；不告不理；訴審?fù)?

ABSTRACT

The separation principle between charge and interrogation is a cardinal principle in modern criminal prosecution activities. The existing code of criminal procedure has already embodied the spirit of this principle, but can hardly carry it out thoroughly. There are many issues which deviate from the very principle in reconnaissance, investigation, charge and interrogation and some other procedures. To define the basic connotation of this principle, elaborate its rationale and significance , analyze current situation of it in our judicial practice , point out the harm effects of indictment mixing with judgment in China’s rule by law, then profit from the foreign legislation and propose some suggestion to perfect the legislation and judiciary, will undoubtedly  beneficial to the modernization of Chinas criminal procedure legal system.

Keywords：the fundamental principle of criminal lawsuit; separation between accusation and interrogation; no trial without charge; identity of accusation and trial
..............................
注：【包括：畢業(yè)論文，任務(wù)書(shū)，開(kāi)題報(bào)告】

【論控審分離原則】相關(guān)文章：

論刑事訴訟中控審分離原則的理論與實(shí)踐06-02

論ＷＴＯ原則與稅法原則的契合10-07

論權(quán)利失效原則06-13

論民事調(diào)解原則09-03

論研究刑事上訴審程序的意義06-23

論審計(jì)查處分離制度08-01

論財(cái)政公平原則08-12

論老實(shí)信用原則08-23

論民事調(diào)解自愿原則10-24

論行政比例原則（55）10-17