- 相關(guān)推薦
托福tpo23綜合寫(xiě)作范文及原文材料
從1880年開(kāi)始的一個(gè)多世紀(jì)以來(lái)，黃杉的數(shù)量在逐漸減少�？茖W(xué)家提出了幾個(gè)假說(shuō)來(lái)解釋黃杉數(shù)量的下降。下面是小編分享的關(guān)于黃杉的托福tpo23綜合寫(xiě)作材料和范文，希望能對(duì)大家有所幫助!
托福tpo23綜合寫(xiě)作范文
In the lecture, the professor points out that the hypothesis made by the reading passage is not adequate to explain why the population of Yellow Cedar is on the
decline. He points out several weaknesses of the statements made by the reading passage.
On one hand, the professor claims that insect parasite may not be the fundamental cause of the decline. In fact, he argues that healthy yellow cedar can secrete chemicals which can kill the cedar bark beetles so that they are unlikely to suffer from insect parasite. The trees that suffers insect parasite have already been sick or on the edge of death.
On the other hand, the professor asserts that brown bears cannot cause overall decline in yellow cedar population. There is decline both on the mainland of North America and islands along the coast. However, there is no brown bear on the islands at all.
What’s more, the professor doubts the hypothesis that the change of climate is to blame for the declination. He admits that the climate has changed rapidly recently. And, if the climate change is the real cause, the number of trees died on the higher elevation should be larger than that on a lower elevation. The fact is, however, on the opposite.
托福tpo23綜合寫(xiě)作閱讀材料：
Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses to explain this decline.
黃杉是北美西北部常見(jiàn)的樹(shù)木。但是從 1880 年開(kāi)始的一個(gè)多世紀(jì)以來(lái)，黃杉的
數(shù)量在逐漸減少。目前，科學(xué)家提出了幾個(gè)假說(shuō)來(lái)解釋黃杉數(shù)量的下降。
One hypothesis is that the yellow cedar decline may be caused by insect parasites, specifically the cedar bark beetle. This beetle is known to attack cedar trees; the beetle larvae eat the wood. There have been recorded instances of sustained beetle attacks overwhelming and killing yellow cedars, so this insect is a good candidate for the cause of the tree’s decline.
其中一個(gè)假說(shuō)認(rèn)為黃杉數(shù)量下降是由以衫皮甲蟲(chóng)為代表的寄生害蟲(chóng)導(dǎo)致。這種甲 蟲(chóng)據(jù)了解是以杉樹(shù)皮為食，而其幼蟲(chóng)則以木質(zhì)部分為食。史上不乏對(duì)于甲蟲(chóng)侵蝕 和導(dǎo)致黃杉大量死亡的記錄。因?yàn)椋@種甲蟲(chóng)很可能是黃杉數(shù)量減少的原因。
A second hypothesis attributes the decline to brown bears. Bears sometimes claw at the cedars in order to eat the tree bark, which has a high sugar content. In fact, the cedar bark can contain as much sugar as the wild berries that are a staple of the bears’ diet. Although the bears’ clawing is unlikely to destroy trees by itself, their aggressive feeding habits may critically weaken enough trees to be responsible for the decline.
第二種假說(shuō)認(rèn)為是棕熊導(dǎo)致了黃杉數(shù)量的減少。熊有時(shí)會(huì)扒下黃杉的樹(shù)皮用以食 用，因?yàn)辄S杉樹(shù)皮還有很高的糖分。事實(shí)上，黃杉樹(shù)皮的含糖量同棕熊主要使用 的野生漿果相差無(wú)幾。雖然棕熊扒樹(shù)皮的行為不會(huì)直接導(dǎo)致黃杉的死亡，但是它 們這種破壞性的.覓食行為卻因?yàn)榻档土藰?shù)木的生命力，而間接導(dǎo)致黃杉數(shù)量的減 少。
The third hypothesis states that gradual changes of climate may be to blame. Over the last hundred years, the patterns of seasonal as well as day-‐to-‐day temperatures have changed in northwestern North America. These changes have
affected the root systems of the yellow cedar trees: the fine surface roots now start growing in the late winter rather than in the early spring. The change in the timing of root growth may have significant consequences. Growing roots are sensitive and are therefore likely to suffer damage from partial freezing on cold winter nights. This frozen root damage may be capable of undermining the health of the whole tree, eventually killing it.
第三個(gè)假說(shuō)是氣候的緩慢變化導(dǎo)致了黃杉數(shù)量的減少。在過(guò)去的一百年里，在北 美西北部，無(wú)論是季節(jié)性的氣候更替還是每天的氣溫調(diào)節(jié)都發(fā)生了變化。這些變 化對(duì)黃杉根系產(chǎn)生了影響。以前，黃杉的表面細(xì)根是初春開(kāi)始生長(zhǎng)的;而現(xiàn)在卻 在晚冬就開(kāi)始生長(zhǎng)。根系生長(zhǎng)時(shí)間的變化可能會(huì)造成非常嚴(yán)重的后果。新生的根 系都非常敏感，因而非常容易因?yàn)槎疽雇聿糠纸Y(jié)冰的溫度受到損害。這種根系 凍傷現(xiàn)象可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致整個(gè)樹(shù)木健康狀況下降，并逐漸導(dǎo)致死亡。
托福tpo23綜合寫(xiě)作聽(tīng)力材料：
Unfortunately， we still do not know what is killing the yellow cedar. None of the explanations discussed in the reading is adequate.
很遺憾，我們還是不知道是什么導(dǎo)致了黃杉的死亡。閱讀部分沒(méi)有一個(gè)假說(shuō)可以 解釋其數(shù)量減少。
First, the cedar bark beetle. Well, the problem with this explanation is these healthy yellow cedars are generally much more resistant to insect infection than other tree species. For example, the bark and leaves of the yellow cedars are concentrated with powerful chemicals that are poisonous to insects. So, healthy cedars are unlikely to suffer from the insect damage. So, how can we explain those dead cedars that were infected with beetles? In those cases, the beetles attacked trees that were already damaged or sick and what probably dead any way. So, the beetles are not the fundamental cause responsible for the decline of the yellow cedars.
首先是杉皮甲蟲(chóng)假說(shuō)。這個(gè)解釋的問(wèn)題在于黃杉相對(duì)于其他樹(shù)種來(lái)說(shuō)其實(shí)有更強(qiáng) 的抵御害蟲(chóng)侵襲的能力。比如，黃杉的樹(shù)皮和葉子上聚集著一些對(duì)于昆蟲(chóng)來(lái)說(shuō)有 毒的的強(qiáng)力化學(xué)物質(zhì)。所以，健康的黃杉是不會(huì)受到害蟲(chóng)損害的。那么，我們?cè)?如何解釋那些因?yàn)榧紫x(chóng)侵襲而死亡的`黃杉呢?這種情況是因?yàn)榧紫x(chóng)侵襲的是已 經(jīng)受損或者患病的黃杉，這些黃杉沒(méi)有甲蟲(chóng)也會(huì)死去。所以，甲蟲(chóng)的入侵不是黃 杉數(shù)量下降的重要因素。
Second, although bears damage some trees, they are not the cause of the over all population decline. Yellow cedars population has been declining all across the northwestern coast of North America, both on the mainland and on the islands just off the coast. There are no bears on the islands, yet the islands cedars are still in decline. Since the decline occurs with and without bears, the bears can not be responsible.
第二，雖然熊破壞一些樹(shù)木，但是他們卻不是整個(gè)黃杉種群數(shù)量下降的原因。在 北美西北部整個(gè)海岸線上的黃杉數(shù)量都在下降，不管是在大陸還是在離岸的島嶼 上。而在那些島嶼上是沒(méi)有熊的，而黃杉的數(shù)量卻依然減少。因?yàn)闊o(wú)論有無(wú)熊黃杉數(shù)量都在減少，所以熊不回事數(shù)量減少的原因。
And finally, the theory about root suffering from frozen damage. Well, the reading passage forgot to take one fact into account. Many more trees are dying in the lower elevations where it is warmer than in the higher elevations where it is cold. If freezing damage were responsible for the decline, we would expect to see more trees die in the cold weather of the high elevations. Instead, more trees die in the relative warm of the low elevations. So, although the climate change may have made the cedar roots more sensitive then they used to be, this is not what killed them.
最后是根系因低溫?fù)p害假說(shuō)。恩，閱讀部分忘掉了一個(gè)事實(shí)，那就是在溫暖的海拔低處，黃杉死亡數(shù)量比相對(duì)寒冷的高海拔地區(qū)要多。如果低溫?fù)p害是數(shù)量減少 的原因，那么我們可以推理在寒冷的高海拔地區(qū)樹(shù)木死亡的要多。然而事實(shí)相反， 溫暖的低海拔地區(qū)死亡的數(shù)量更多。所以，雖然氣候的改變讓黃杉根系變得比過(guò) 去更加銘感，但是這不是他們死亡的原因。
【托福tpo23綜合寫(xiě)作及原文材料】相關(guān)文章：
托福綜合寫(xiě)作材料12-05
托福TPO28綜合寫(xiě)作參考范文及原文材料03-26